DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. Johnson

7/19/2000

is required are several indicators of intoxication to establish "probable cause to believe" that a defendant was operating while under the influence. See id. at 316. An examination of the record demonstrates that Ritchie had a substantial amount of reliable, factual information indicating to a reasonable police officer that Johnson had probably violated the statute prohibiting driving while under the influence of an intoxicant.


. In addition to the illegal turn, the indicators of intoxication available to Ritchie included: Johnson's immediate argumentative demeanor, Ritchie's detection of the odor of intoxicants "emitting directly from Mr. Johnson," and Ritchie's observations that Johnson was unsteady in his movement and stance, that he had somewhat slurred speech and that his eyes were bloodshot. Furthermore, when Ritchie asked Johnson if he had had anything to drink, Johnson candidly responded, " robably too much." And, finally, in response to a question of when did he have his last drink, Johnson nonsensically responded "two seconds" before the traffic stop.


. Each indicator alone would not be enough. But each indicator builds upon another, and, as they build up, reasonable inferences about the cumulative effect can be drawn. A point is reached where the sum of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. In this case, the indicators of intoxication observed by Ritchie immediately after the stop build up to support probable cause to believe that Johnson was operating while under the influence. Once that threshold was reached, Ritchie was justified in administering the PBT. Finally, when the PBT results are added to the indicators of intoxication, there is probable cause for an arrest for operating while intoxicated.


By the Court. -- Judgment affirmed.


This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4.






Page 1 2 3 4 

Wisconsin DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.