 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Moody1/13/2000
sible in the absence of some corroborating evidence. The only authority she provides for her position is a non-specific citation to State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 385 N.W.2d 196 (1985). In Fry, we referred to the rule of State v. Verhasselt, 83 Wis. 2d 647, 661, 266 N.W.2d 342 (1978), that "conviction of a crime may not be grounded on the admission or confessions of the accused alone." Fry, 129 Wis. 2d at 306. This case, however-unlike Fry, and Verhasselt-is a civil case and Moody has offered no authority extending the Fry/Verhasselt rule to statements against interest made by a party in a civil trial.
By the Court. -- Judgment affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4.
Page 1 2 Wisconsin DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|