 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
STATE v. PRATER5/22/1998
ed States Supreme Court in Hensley: an investigative stop made in objective reliance on a police dispatcher's bulletin is justified if the dispatcher who broadcast the bulletin possessed reasonable suspicion of imminent public danger justifying the stop. See Hensley, 105 S.Ct. at 682.
We therefore remand this case so that Judge Cutler may evaluate the underlying facts and unbroadcast details of the telephone call to the dispatcher and consider them in deciding whether the investigative stop in this case was supported by reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle may be based on a sufficiently detailed telephoned report that the driver may be driving while intoxicated. See Goodlataw v. State, 847 P.2d 589, 590-91 (Alaska App. 1993); Effenbeck v. State, 700 P.2d 811, 812 (Alaska App. 1985).
We VACATE the superior court's order and REMAND for further proceedings. We do not retain jurisdiction in this case.
Page 1 2 3 4 Alaska DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|