 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Cham6/1/2004
does not appear that the district court abused its discretion, we affirm the district court's determination that Cham was entitled to an interpreter under Minnesota statute.
DECISION
We reverse the order of the district court dismissing the complaint against Cham. We remand with instructions to reinstate the complaint against Cham and proceed with the disposition of Cham's case. Because we reverse and remand the district court's dismissal of the action against Cham on this basis, we do not reach the state's remaining arguments for reinstatement of the complaint against Cham.
We affirm the district court's conclusion that Cham is entitled to an interpreter.
Reversed and remanded.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 Minnesota DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|