 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Smith10/20/1999
rative hearing regarding the termination of public employee need not comply with all rules of evidence applicable in formal trials). The fact remains, however, that in this criminal trial, the officer laid an adequate foundation as required by our cases in his live testimony.
{17} Accordingly, because the foundation in any kind of evidence in Bransford was inadequate whereas the foundation in live testimony in this case was adequate, we conclude that Defendant's right to due process has not been violated.
CONCLUSION
{18} For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Defendant's conviction for DWI, first offense.
{19} IT IS SO ORDERED.
M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO, Judge
WE CONCUR:
LYNN PICKARD, Chief Judge
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
|