DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. Turner

10/11/1999

ertions that the authorized punishment for his offenses either offends contemporary standards of decency or exceeds what is necessary to accomplish a legitimate penological objective. Aside from first degree murder, the rape of a child is the most heinous crime a person can commit in our society. Additionally, this court has recently observed that criminal statutes prohibiting incestuous relationships reflect society's belief that incest destabilizes the family unit, threatening our society's ability to function in an orderly manner. Smith v. State, No. 01C01-9811-CR-00438, 1999 WL 160992, at *6 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville), perm. to appeal denied, (Tenn. 1999). Thus, the authorized punishment for the appellant's offenses is reasonably related to the State's legitimate interest in deterring the rape of children and in prohibiting sexual activity between those related within the proscribed degrees of kinship. Id. at *6; State v. Holder, No. 01C01-9501-CC-00015, 1996 WL 125905, at *4 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, March 22, 1996).


Moreover, with respect to the appellant's proportionality challenge, our supreme court in Harris, 844 S.W.2d at 603, set forth the applicable analysis:


he sentence is initially compared with the crime committed. Unless this threshold comparison leads to an inference of gross disproportionality, the inquiry ends - - the sentence is constitutional. In those rare cases where this inference does arise, the analysis proceeds by comparing (1) the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction, and (2) the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.


We conclude that there is no inference of gross disproportionality under the facts of this case. Accordingly, the appellant's argument is without merit.


III. Conclusion


For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.


CONCUR: Jerry L. Smith, Judge Joe G. Riley, Judge






Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 

Tennessee DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.