 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Davis v. State9/10/1999
a reasonable doubt, as required by Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-5-42. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. During the penalty phase of the proceedings, the jury, by a vote of 11 to 1, recommended that Davis be sentenced to death by electrocution. The trial court accepted the jury's recommendation. Davis appealed, raising 12 issues of alleged error. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Davis's conviction and sentence.
In his certiorari petition, Davis raised nine issues concerning the merits of his conviction and sentence. We have carefully reviewed all of the issues presented in the petition, the briefs, and the oral argument. All of these issues were fully addressed by the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. We have studied the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals and have examined the record for plain error. We find no error, plain or otherwise, in either the guilt phase or the sentencing phase of Davis's trial that would warrant a reversal of his conviction or his sentence. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Hooper, C.J., and Maddox, Houston , Cook, Lyons, and Johnstone, JJ., concur.
Brown, J., recuses herself.
Page 1 2 Alabama DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|