 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Enloe v. State7/22/1999
fe for him to do so." (Citations omitted.) Smith v. State, 236 Ga. App. 548, 552 (3) (512 SE2d 19) (1999).
Here, the two other DUI incidents involving Enloe were very similar to the DUI in this case and were admissible for the purposes of showing his bent of mind and course of conduct. " t is well settled that in a bench trial the court has broader discretion in admitting evidence than in cases where a jury is involved. [Cit.]" Davis v. State, 189 Ga. App. 412, 413 (2) (376 SE2d 421) (1988). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the similar transaction evidence. See Bayer, supra at 710-711 (3); Fields v. State, 223 Ga. App. 569, 570-571 (2) (479 SE2d 393) (1996).
Judgment affirmed. Pope, P.J., and Smith, J., concur.
|