DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. McKnight

8/5/1999

arceration of the offender. The legislature has clearly expressed its intent that jail sentences for DUI convictions be promptly served. We believe, however, that the legislature has also clearly expressed its intent that the failure of the sheriff to require a DUI offender to serve a sentence within a certain period of time does not relieve the offender from the requirement of serving the sentence.


In summarizing the proposed bill to the members of the Judiciary Committee of the Tennessee House of Representatives, Representative Roy Herron, the sponsor of the bill, explained that the legislation provided "if the sheriff doesn't require that as he's supposed to . . . if somehow the ball's dropped, that doesn't mean you don't have to serve the time." He further stated that the bill "makes clear that if for some reason, you don't begin serving within the time period required by law, that that doesn't mean your sentence is no longer valid." H. Judiciary Comm., 99th Gen. Assembly (Tenn., Apr. 5, 1995) (statement of Representative Roy Herron).


We believe that by enacting chapter number 524 of the Public Acts of 1995, the legislature intended that a DUI offender not escape responsibility for serving a sentence simply because space was not available to serve the sentence in the county jail within a specified period of time. Subject to constitutional constraints, policy decisions such as this are within the purview of the legislature. Under the facts presented in this case, we cannot conclude that requiring the Defendant to serve his sentence would be inconsistent with fundamental principles of liberty and Justice in violation of the Defendant's due process rights.


The judgment of the trial court is accordingly affirmed.


DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE


CONCUR:


DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE


NORMA McGEE OGLE, JUDGE






Page 1 2 3 4 

Tennessee DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.