 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Sligh v. First National Bank of Holmes County2/4/1999
R>
. The Slighs, failed to demonstrate that there is more there is no causal connection between the lending of credit for the purchase of an automobile and the accident two an one-half years later. The lower court was correct in granting summary judgment. There are no genuine issues as to material facts presented to defeat summary judgment.
CONCLUSION
. In the case sub judice, the lower court did not err in granting summary judgment. The evidence in the record presented no genuine issue as to a material fact. The Slighs relied heavily on the deposition of Gene Lorance and others as their source of facts. However, the record contained only excerpts of depositions which still supported the ruling of the lower court. Accordingly, the judgment of the lower courts grant of summary judgment is affirmed.
. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
PRATHER, C.J., SULLIVAN, P.J., BANKS, ROBERTS, MILLS AND WALLER, JJ., CONCUR. PITTMAN, P.J., CONCURS IN RESULT ONLY. McRAE, J., DISSENTS WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION.
|