DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. Leslie

3/23/1999

de Ann. § 40-35-302(e), interprets the "thirty percent" criteria as the time period defendant Leslie must serve before being released on probation. I conclude, however, after review of the record, that the trial court's statement of "thirty percent" was intended to apply only to defendant Leslie's release eligibility date for work release or other related rehabilitative programs, not probation.


Noting the trial court's reference to a "range I offender," the majority correctly states that "release eligibility date percentages have no relationship to sentencing in misdemeanors." Thus, the majority properly concludes that the trial court's sentencing of defendant Leslie as a range I offender is misplaced and of no significance. However, the majority improperly uses this error as the basis for concluding that the trial court intended the "thirty percent" to be that part of the sentence to be served in confinement. More importantly, the majority disregards the court's sentencing of defendant Whitehead in construing defendant Leslie's sentence. In sentencing defendant Whitehead, the trial court also sentenced her as a range I standard offender, but expressly ordered that Whitehead be placed on probation after thirty days service. If, indeed, the trial court intended for defendant Leslie to receive probation after service of part of his sentence, the court could easily have done so, just as it did with defendant Whitehead. Thus, I interpret the trial court's order that defendant Leslie's sentence of eleven months, twenty-nine days be served in its entirety without any portion being suspended, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(e); and with eligibility for release into rehabilitative programs pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(d) at thirty percent.


Accordingly, I find the trial court's denial of probation justified under the facts presented.


DAVID G. HAYES, Judge






Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Tennessee DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.