 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Economic and Employment Development v. Taylor2/8/1996
voluntary, there is nothing in the record to suggest that she did so with the intention of being terminated. Therefore, the circuit court was correct in reversing the decision of the Board, and remanding the case for the Board to determine whether Taylor is disqualified from receiving benefits for misconduct connected with her work, under L.E. § 8-1003, or gross misconduct, under L.E. § 8-1002. See Allen, 275 Md. at 87. We express no opinion on whether her conduct amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct.
JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY AFFIRMED. CASE REMANDED TO CIRCUIT COURT WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO REMAND TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.
APPEAL OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FREDERICK COUNTY DISMISSED.
COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANT.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Maryland DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|