 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Pettigrew8/3/1993
trial court's actions, although there was ample opportunity for him to have done so. Given that counsel for the codefendants either objected or joined in the other's objection while Defendant Bannister remained silent, we can conclude only that Defendant Bannister was satisfied with the trial court's handling of the matter or that he affirmatively preferred to have his case decided by the alternate juror. We will not secondguess such an obviously tactical matter. See (describing tactics involved in picking jury).
Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, we affirm the trial court on all four issues.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
|