 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Anderson v. Commonwealth1/14/1992
Junius Anderson, Jr. appeals from a conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. He argues that the conviction must be reversed because the evidence proved that he was not lawfully arrested. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the appeal.
The arrest warrant in the record states that Anderson was arrested by State Trooper C. F. Rosemond for driving under the influence of alcohol. The order of conviction recites that Anderson was tried February 21, 1990, in the Circuit Court of Caroline County and convicted of the charged offense. The record does not contain a transcript of the circuit court proceedings.
Rule 5A:8(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia provides as follows:
Written Statement -- In lieu of a transcript, a written statement of facts, testimony, and other incidents of the case, which may include or consist of a portion of the transcript, becomes a part of the record when:
(1) within 55 days after entry of judgment a copy of such statement is filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court. A copy must be mailed or delivered to opposing counsel accompanied by notice that such statement will be presented to the trial Judge no earlier than 15 days nor later than 20 days after such filing; and
(2) the statement is signed by the trial Judge and filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court. The Judge may sign the statement forthwith upon its presentation to him if it is signed by counsel for all parties, but if objection is made to the accuracy or
completeness of the statement, it shall be signed in accordance with subsection (d) of this Rule.
A document styled, "Statement of Fact and Abbreviated Record" was endorsed, "We ask for this," by the Commonwealth's Attorney and Anderson's counsel. The statement does not contain a notation showing that it was filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court "within 55 days after entry of judgment" as required by Rule 5A:8(c). However, the statement contains the signature of the trial Judge with the notation, "Enter: May 17, 1990," and a notation on the margin, "Received 5-21-90," accompanied by the initials "AM." Rule 5A:8(c) does not contain a specified period within which the trial Judge must sign an agreed statement of fact. Rather, it recites " he Judge may sign the statement forthwith." Id. Although the Commonwealth Attorney's and Anderson's counsel agreed on a joint statement of facts and despite the absence of time limitations circumscribing the trial Judge's actions, the Commonwealth argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the statement of facts is indispensable to the resolution of the appeal and the statement was not filed "within 55 days after entry of judgment . . . in the office of the clerk of the trial court." Rule 5A:8(c)(1).
(1-2) " written statement of facts becomes a part of the record only if all of the requirements of Rule 5A:8 are complied with by the parties and the trial Judge." Mayhood v. Mayhood, 4 Va. App. 365, 368-69, 358 S.E.2d 182, 184 (1987). In Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 341 S.E.2d 400 (1986), this Court established a firm policy concerning the filing of transcripts.
If . . . the transcript is indispensable to the determination of the case, then the requirements for making the transcript a part of the record on appeal must be strictly adhered to. This Court has no authority to mak
Page 1 2 3 Virginia DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|