 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Catlin7/10/1990
y of those errors in itself is not reversible, denied appellant a fair trial."
We recognize that cumulative errors may merit a reversal even if no single error, standing by itself, would merit reversal. State v. DeMarco (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 31 OBR 390, 509 N.E.2d 1256. This principle has no application in the case before us, however. The essential predicate for the application of this principle is that there must be errors. We have found no error in the proceedings, harmless or otherwise.
Catlin's Fifth Assignment of Error is overruled.
All of Catlin's assignments of error having been overruled, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Wolff, P.J., and Brogan, J., concur.
|