 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
HARRIS v. STATE9/8/1982
n the trial date was set by the court. At trial on the charge of failure to appear, he was afforded the opportunity to explain to the trial court why he had failed to appear for trial. At that hearing, he never denied having actual notice of the date he was to appear, and his only
reason for failing to appear was that he believed the charges were to be dropped. We find no violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. 22-311 (Repl. 1962), nor do we find a violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Affirmed.
GLAZE, J., not participating.
|