 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Slaughter v. Commonwealth3/3/2003
Christy N. Slaughter (Licensee) appeals from the April 17, 2002, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) dismissing her statutory appeal from a one-year suspension of her driver's license, imposed by the Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (Department), pursuant to section 1547 of the Vehicle Code. We affirm.
By official notice dated December 19, 2001, the Department informed Licensee that her driver's license was to be suspended for one year, effective January 23, 2002, based on her refusal of a request to submit to chemical testing on October 21, 2001. Licensee filed a statutory appeal with the trial court, which held a de novo hearing on March 15, 2002.
The Department's evidence included the testimony of a police officer, who stated that she observed Licensee enter a car, start it up and put it in gear. Licensee disputed that version of the events, stating that she had intended to walk to a friend's house, but the police officer told her to get in the car and drive away.
The trial court found the police officer's testimony to be credible and held that the police officer had reasonable grounds to believe that Licensee was operating, or in actual physical control of, the vehicle. Accordingly, the trial court dismissed Licensee's appeal.
On appeal to this court, Licensee argues that the trial court judge, the Honorable Alan K. Silberstein, a commissioned judge on the Municipal Court of Philadelphia assigned to preside as a judge of the Court of Common Pleas, lacked authority to preside over her statutory appeal. Relying on Niedermayer v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 797 A.2d 409 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002) (en banc), Licensee asserts that Judge Silberstein was not sitting properly as a judge on the Court of Common Pleas, because the order temporarily assigning him to that position contains no expiration date.
In Niedermayer, a Municipal Court judge was temporarily assigned to preside as a judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The 1994 assignment order contained no expiration date or words limiting the duration of the assignment. In 1996, at age seventy, the judge in Niedermayer retired.
Thereafter, the judge consented to temporary assignment as a senior judge on the Municipal Court. Although the judge had retired and no further order was entered, the judge continued to preside over cases in the common pleas court. On April 20, 2001, the judge issued an order affirming the Department's suspension of Thomas Niedermayer's driving privilege.
On appeal from that decision, in Niedermayer this court first observed that the 1994 assignment order contained no expiration date or any language limiting the duration of the temporary assignment. Despite the use of the word "temporary" in the order, the court in Niedermayer concluded that the assignment was not intended to be a temporary one, but was meant to be an assignment of indefinite duration. The court then stated as follows:
nce [the judge] retired at seventy years of age, he no longer held the office of Municipal Court judge and he had no constitutional right to do so. We fail to see how a "temporary" administrative order assigning a Municipal Court judge to the Court of Common Pleas can continue to have effect after the Municipal Court judge no longer holds that office. Thus, we conclude that, as a matter of law, the March 14, 1994 order of assignment expired no later than [the judge's] mandatory retirement on April 25, 1996. Id. at 413 (footnote omitted).
The Department argues, inter alia, that the present case is factually distinguishable f
Page 1 2 Pennsylvania DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|