 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Hoffert11/22/2002
e so that the trial court could properly advise the defendant according to R.C. 2929.19(B)(3). Our review of the record shows, and the state concedes, that the trial court did not properly notify Hoffert in this case. Therefore, Hoffert's second assignment of error is sustained.
{ } We affirm the trial court's judgment with respect to the findings of guilt. But we vacate Hoffert's sentence and remand this cause for the trial court to notify Hoffert about post-release controls and sanctions as required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(3). Judgment accordingly.
Sundermann and Winkler, JJ., concur.
Page 1 2 3 4 Ohio DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|