 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Severson11/27/2002
of facts used by the circuit court and by this court is insufficient to support his conviction of OMVWI, without the results of the blood test. Therefore, the arguments that Severson presents in this appeal could not result in a reversal of his judgment of conviction for OMVWI, even if we were to accept his views as accurate statements of the law.
. Accordingly, although the State argues that Severson's conviction should be affirmed under our holdings in State v. Krajewski, 2002 WI 97, 255 Wis. 2d 98, 648 N.W.2d 385, State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, 248 Wis. 2d 881, 637 N.W.2d 411 and Village of Little Chute v. Walitalo, 2002 WI App 211, _ Wis. 2d _, 650 N.W.2d 891, review denied, 2002 WI 121, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ___ N.W.2d ___ (Sept. 26, 2002) (No. 01-3060), because we conclude that there is nothing in the arguments presented in this appeal that bears on the circuit court's judgment of conviction for Severson's violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), we do not analyze the applicability of Krawjewski, VanLaarhoven, Walitalo, or any of the other cases relating to the Fourth Amendment issues raised by Severson. Instead, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court without further discussion.
By the Court. -- Judgment affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. § 809.23(1)(b)4.
Page 1 2 Wisconsin DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|