 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Jordan v. State5/9/2001
remained with the State. In these circumstances, even if the prosecutor's comment that Jordan could have called Pickus was impermissible, we are satisfied that the argument did not shift the burden of proof. We conclude that the comment did not appreciably affect the jury's verdict. Therefore, any error was harmless.
Conclusion
The judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 Alaska DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|