 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
THOMPSON v. STATE11/21/1997
d an opened bottle of alcohol were also found in the vehicle; and marijuana was found in his pocket — certainly provided sufficient circumstantial evidence to indicate Thompson was guilty of engaging in illegal drug activity.
In view of the fact that the state's standard of proof was "reasonable satisfaction," in view of the undisputed circumstantial evidence, and in view of the presumption of correctness we must afford the trial court when it has heard ore tenus evidence, I would affirm. Therefore, I must dissent.
THOMPSON, Judge, dissenting.
|