 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Twohig v. Blackmer5/20/1996
knew and thought about Gordon House. Leslie Linthicum, Potential House Jurors Questioned, Albuquerque J., June 7, 1994, at C3.
{28} Conclusion. We conclude that to have allowed the gag order to stand in the face of a complete lack of factual findings to support the Conclusion that such an order was necessary to preserve the parties' right to a fair trial would have done serious inJustice to the principle that post-speech remedies are favored over prior restraints. For the foregoing reasons we issued our writ of superintending control vacating the gag order entered by the trial court.
{29} IT IS SO ORDERED.
RICHARD E. RANSOM, Justice
WE CONCUR:
STANLEY F. FROST, Chief Justice
JOSEPH F. BACA, Justice
GENE E. FRANCHINI, Justice
PAMELA B. MINZNER, Justice
|