 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Keith2/6/2003
est different than the one he was told would be administered at the hospital.
. Keith also contends that Officer Ziorgen's failure to read the entire "Informing the Accused" form to him constituted a failure to properly inform Keith of his right to request an alternative test. We reject Keith's argument. Officer Ziorgen testified that he read the entire form to Keith. Keith testified that the officer read only part of the form. The circuit court believed Officer Ziorgen. We affirm that credibility finding because we cannot say that Officer Ziorgen's testimony on this point is "inherently or patently incredible." See State v. Daniels, 117 Wis. 2d 9, 17, 343 N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App. 1983). To the contrary, the record contains no reason to doubt the officer on this topic.
By the Court. -- Judgment affirmed.
Recommended for publication in the official reports.
Page 1 2 3 Wisconsin DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|