 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Rex1/29/2003
basis for bias on her part because, as the State points out in its brief, the reason for her leaving was a "compliment" to her. Faced with the picture McMurray had now painted for the jury, the State had the right to explore whether there was, in fact, a different picture that should be painted. Recross was permissible because the evidence elicited would directly impeach McMurray's credibility on the issue of why she was subjected to a hostile work environment. As such, the trial court did not misuse its discretion when it ruled that McMurray's answer had opened the door.
By the Court. -- Judgment and order affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wisconsin DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|