 |
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Balderston v. Maryland9/9/1992 ife style"); Heitman v. State, 622 S.W.2d 760 (Mo. App. 1981) (no sentencing credit for home confinement as a condition of pretrial release). Cf. State v. Speaks, 829 P.2d 1096, 1098 (Wash. 1992) (defendant entitled to credit against sentence for time spent in involuntary "home detention" where statute provides credit for all "confinement" and explicitly includes "home detention" in definition of confinement).
Thus, the trial court did not err in finding that appellant was not entitled credit, as of right, against his original sentence for the time he spent in voluntary home confinement.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANT.
Disposition
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Page 1 2 3 4 Maryland DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|