DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

People v. Durango

4/2/2003

ection 262 involving the use of force or violence for which the person is sentenced to the state prison. . . . " must register. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (a)(2)(A), italics added.)


Defendant's unusual interpretation of the plain language of the statute does not merit extended analysis. "Our role in construing a statute is to ascertain the intent of the Legislature in order to effectuate the purpose of the law. [Citation.] Because the statutory language is generally the most reliable indicator of that intent, we look first at the words themselves, giving them their usual and ordinary meaning and construing them in context. [Citation.] If the plain language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, our inquiry ends, and we need not embark on judicial construction. [Citations.] If the statutory language contains no ambiguity, the Legislature is presumed to have meant what it said, and the plain meaning of the statute governs. [Citations.]" (People v. Johnson (2002) 28 Cal.4th 240, 244.)


Here, the statute is clear on its face. There is no ambiguity. Penal Code section 290, subdivision (a)(2)(A), requires any person convicted of a violation of section 261, subdivision (a)(3), of the Penal Code to register as a sex offender. The statute could not be expressed more clearly. The court was mandated to require defendant to register as a sex offender. It follows that Penal Code section 296 requires defendant to provide blood and saliva samples. From the plain reading of the statute there is no evidence of any legislative intent whatsoever to limit registration to crimes of forcible rape. We note there is no authority supporting defendant's view, nor has defendant cited any authority that provides for such an interpretation. We reject defendant's assertion that there is such a legislative requirement.


The judgment is affirmed.


WE CONCUR:


SILLS, P.J.


BEDSWORTH, J.






Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

California DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.