DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

Mester v. State

10/29/1999

nd overwhelming).


An arresting officer may give his opinion concerning a defendant's intoxication. Grimes v. State, 488 So.2d 8, 9 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986). Here, Dunston's testimony that Mester's car was weaving, that Mester smelled of alcohol, that his speech was slurred, that his eyes were bloodshot, that his balance was "off", that he failed the field tests, and that it was Dunston's opinion that Mester was intoxicated, established that Mester was unable to safely drive an automobile because he was intoxicated. We have held that "'the testimony of the arresting officer ... is of itself sufficient to present a factual issue as to the intoxication of defendant and justifies the denial of defendant's motion to exclude the evidence made at the Conclusion of the State's evidence.'" Charles v. State, 424 So.2d 715, 717 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). To the extent that conflicting evidence existed, it was not so strong or persuasive as to overcome credible evidence to the contrary.


"'In an ore tenus proceeding, it is the duty of the trial court to resolve conflict in testimony and render judgment accordingly. Where the trial court resolves a factual issue on conflicting evidence, the reviewing court may not reverse it if there is any credible evidence to support the judgment.'" Richarson v. State, 668 So.2d 130, 137 (Ala.Cr.App. 1995)(quoting Big Ticket Broadcasting Co. v. Santos, 594 So.2d 1241, 1243-44 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991)(citations omitted). Considering the evidence in a light favorable to the prosecution, we find that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction for driving under the influence as defined under § 32-5A-191(a)(2) Ala.Code 1975.


V.


Mester contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the test printouts generated by the I-5000 test. For the reasons stated in part III, the test results were not admissible.


Based on the foregoing, Mester's conviction is affirmed.


APPLICATION OVERRULED; MEMORANDUM WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; AFFIRMED.


Long, P.J., and McMillan, Baschab, and Fry, JJ., concur.






Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Alabama DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.