 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
People v. Wilson6/30/2003
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
Mark Daniel Wilson entered a negotiated guilty plea to causing personal injury while driving under the influence of alcohol (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (a)) and Wilson admitted inflicting great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 12022.7). The court sentenced him to prison for five years: the two-year middle term for causing personal injury while driving under the influence of alcohol enhanced three years for inflicting great bodily injury. The court denied a request to resentence Wilson.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible but not arguable issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying Wilson's motion for resentencing, and (2) whether the trial court erred in denying probation.
We granted Wilson permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. A review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issues referred to pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Competent counsel has represented Wilson on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
WE CONCUR:
BENKE, Acting P. J.
NARES, J.
Page 1 California DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|