 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Martin11/12/1998
the third one is not grounds for disregarding the sworn testimony of Deputy McCord as to what he believes he saw.
. Because there was sufficient objective data from which Deputy McCord could have formed the requisite particularized suspicion to stop Martin for the purpose of conducting a further investigation, the District Court did not err in denying Martin's motion to suppress the evidence gleaned from that stop on those grounds. Affirmed.
J. A. TURNAGE
We concur: KARLA M. GRAY, JAMES C. NELSON, W. WILLIAM LEAPHART, & TERRY N. TRIEWEILER.
|