 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Clah6/10/1997
pent in the Denver facility. However, this misnomer should not deprive the trial court of its discretionary ability to grant a suspension of the sentence equal to the period of treatment; nor should it deprive the Defendant of the trial court's act of clemency in this regard. Ignoring the label used by the trial court, the offset granted for the Denver treatment should be affirmed to the extent it does not interfere with Defendant serving the six-month mandatory sentence required by Section 66-8-102(G). See ) (trial court decision that reaches the correct result for the wrong reason may be affirmed if not fact dependent).
{21} The grant of credit for the presentence alcohol treatment is reversed. The post-sentence offset, treated as a suspension with conditions, is affirmed.
{22} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RICHARD C. BOSSON, Judge
M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO, Judge
|