 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Davis v. Maryland12/9/1993
upies that status or has that attitude. In that event, the purpose of the voir dire examination is to identify the prospective jurors with that status or attitude. This may be accomplished by expanding the scope of the voir dire somewhat; rather than the six questions the trial judge asked in this case, it may be necessary to ask an additional
two or three. Certainly, that is not too high a price to pay to give meaning to a right guaranteed by our Constitution.
I would reverse and remand for new trial.
ELDRIDGE, J. joins in the views expressed herein.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Maryland DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|