 |
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. VanBebber5/8/2003
Rehearing petition filed: 5/20/2003; Rehearing denied: 8/25/2003.
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. PAUL VANBEBBER, RESPONDENT.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions Second District - Case No. 2D00-4857 (Collier County)
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner
Joshua Faett and Rexford Darrow of the Law Offices of Casassa, Mangone, Miller and Faett, Naples, Florida, for Respondent
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam
We have for review the decision in State v. VanBebber, 805 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), which certified conflict with the decision in State v. Warner, 721 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved on other grounds, 762 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2000), on the issue of whether the mitigator in section 921.0026(2)(j), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), is available to support a downward departure from a sentence for a driving under the influence (DUI) conviction. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons explained below, we hold the mitigator in section 921.0026(2)(j) is available to support a downward departure from a sentence for a felony DUI conviction. Accordingly, we approve the Second District's decision in VanBebber, and disapprove Warner to the extent it conflicts with this decision.
BACKGROUND
The Second District summarized the facts of this case as follows:
On May 23, 1999, Paul VanBebber was driving home after a party at which he had consumed sufficient alcohol that his faculties were impaired. He failed to stop at a stop sign and collided with another vehicle that contained a family of six: two parents, a six-year-old son, a four-year-old daughter, a four-week-old daughter, and the father's brother who was visiting from Columbia. The three children suffered injuries and their uncle was killed in the crash. The State charged VanBebber with one count of DUI with property damage, three counts of DUI with personal injury , one of them with serious bodily injury, and one count of DUI/manslaughter. VanBebber, exhibiting extreme and sincere remorse while recognizing his fault, pleaded nolo to all offenses as charged.
At the sentencing hearing, the trial court heard from members of the victim's family as well as VanBebber's, including VanBebber himself. Each side outlined the devastating effect the accident has had on the families. Defense counsel argued for a downward departure from the guidelines sentence of 175.9 to 240 months based on the statutory mitigator of "offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner and was an isolated incident for which the defendant has shown remorse." § 921.0026(2)(j), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). The trial court agreed that the evidence fulfilled the requirements of section 921.0026(2)(j) and imposed a downward departure. It sentenced VanBebber to 200 months' incarceration for the counts of DUI/manslaughter and DUI with serious personal injury, but suspended it upon completion of fifteen years' probation with special conditions. The State does not dispute that the evidence presented at the sentencing hearing supported the mitigator,[ ] although the trial court did observe with some puzzlement that it was unsure how one would commit this crime in a sophisticated manner. The State objected to the downward departure, thus preserving this issue, which it then a
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Florida DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|