 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Ruiten6/28/1988
Co., 102 N.M. 614, 698 P.2d 887 (Ct. App.1985). We do not find that it was against all logic for the trial court to allow plaintiff to file its requested findings and conclusions beyond the ten-day limit of the local rule.
The revocation of defendant's driver's license for failure to submit to a blood-alcohol test is affirmed. The denials of defendant's motion to recuse and his motion to strike plaintiff's requested findings and conclusions are also affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BIVINS, Judge, and APODACA, Judge, CONCUR
|