 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Hoye v. Commonwealth6/4/1991
le, or chapter containing such conditions, requirements, provisions, contents, or portions thereof. 1989 Va. Acts 1926.
Code § 18.2-271.1(E) expressly provided that the appellant's November 28, 1988 conviction for operating a motor vehicle in violation of restrictions imposed by Code § 18.2-271.1 was a violation of Code § 46.1-350. The quoted provision of the 1989 Acts translates that reference to Code § 46.2-301, a violation expressly embraced within the scope of Code § 46.2-351. Therefore, the trial court acted properly in considering that conviction in adjudging the appellant an habitual offender.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Disposition
Affirmed.
|