 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Coombs4/16/2003
the certifying scientist can effectively substitute for the right to confront the actual analyst.
Because RSA 265:90 allows for the testimony of a certifying scientist in place of the analyst, we hold that the admission of the blood test report did not violate the defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause.
Affirmed.
BROCK, C.J., and BRODERICK, NADEAU, and DALIANIS, JJ., concurred.
|