 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Stivers v. State9/25/2003
decision, Stivers has the burden of showing that the court's refusal to overrule the prior decision would result in injustice or great injury. See Hill v. State, 347 Ark. 441, 65 S.W.3d 408 (2002); B.C. v. State, 344 Ark. 385, 40 S.W.3d 315 (2001). Here, Stivers's entire "argument" on the point is the simple statement: "In reversing this case, [Stivers] asks this court to overrule Adams v. State." Stivers has clearly failed to meet his burden, and his request that this court overrule Adams must be soundly rejected.
Affirmed.
Thornton, J., not participating.
Page 1 2 3 4 Arkansas DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|