 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Foster v. State9/9/2004
A Fulton County grand jury indicted Russell Foster on two counts of first degree vehicular homicide based upon driving under the influence and reckless driving, two counts of second degree vehicular homicide and five traffic offenses. Foster entered a guilty plea to first degree vehicular homicide based on reckless driving (count 2) and reckless driving (count 6), which merged into count 2 for sentencing purposes. Subsequently, Foster filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which the trial court denied. Foster appeals, alleging his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and that, as a result, his plea was not intelligently and voluntarily entered. We disagree and affirm Foster's convictions.
"A ruling on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea lies within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of such discretion." [FN1] When the validity of a guilty plea is challenged, the state bears the burden of showing affirmatively from the record that the defendant offered his plea knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. [FN2] The state may do this by showing through the record of the guilty plea hearing that (1) the defendant freely and voluntarily entered the plea with (2) an understanding of the nature of the charges against him and (3) an understanding of the consequences of his plea. [FN3]
However, if the motion to withdraw is based on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant who pleads guilty bears the burden of showing that his counsel erred and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pled guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. [FN4] The trial court's findings of fact are subject to a "clearly erroneous" standard of review. [FN5] And there is a presumption that counsel's advice to plead guilty fell within the wide range of reasonable professional conduct demanded of attorneys. [FN6]
In this case, Foster argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel advised him to plead guilty to a crime that the state could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Specifically, Foster maintains the state could not have proven the reckless driving charge. The record belies this claim.
"Any person who drives any vehicle in reckless disregard for the safety of persons or property commits the offense of reckless driving." [FN7] Here, the evidence shows that Foster was driving over the speed limit during rush hour traffic, that he took his eyes off the road to retrieve a cell phone that had fallen while he was on a call, that he swerved at least four feet over the solid white line and into the emergency lane, that he passed over rumble strips intended to alert a driver of his location on the road, that he scraped the side of a truck in the emergency lane, that he struck an officer standing inside the emergency lane, and that Foster's vehicle carried the officer approximately 90 feet away from where he was hit and sent the officer into and over the retaining wall. The officer was in uniform and his marked police vehicle had its blue lights flashing. The evidence further shows that after Foster struck the officer, he drove to the next overpass, parked, got out of the car and walked back to the crime scene. He was not aware he had hit anyone, and evidence shows that Foster did not take any evasive measures during the incident. Foster refused to take a blood test and, during the hour and a half the police car remained at the scene, fell asleep or passed out in the back seat of a patrol car.
*2 The state further presented evidence of Foster's poor driving record, including convictions for DUI, speeding, disregarding signs or a traffic control device, driving with no proof of insurance
Page 1 2 Georgia DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|