 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Woodhead1/27/2004
uggle in the apartment, and Woodhead did not preserve the condition of the knife that he claimed the decedent used to attack him. Although blood was discovered in the serrations of the knife, the quantity of blood was insufficient to determine its type and there were no fingerprints on the knife. In the reasons for judgment, the trial judge concluded that Woodhead's statements, standing alone, do not constitute appreciable evidence of an overt act or hostile demonstration to warrant introduction of evidence of the decedent's dangerous character. Based on the foregoing jurisprudence, we do not find the trial judge's ruling was in error.
The record was reviewed for errors patent, according to LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 920; State v. Oliveaux, and State v. Weiland. The review reveals no errors patent in this case.
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the defendant's conviction is affirmed.
AFFIRMED
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Louisiana DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|