DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

Kennedy v. State

5/7/2004

Geraldine Kennedy pled guilty to the offenses of driving under the influence, driving with an unlawful alcohol concentration, and failure to maintain lane. Kennedy later moved, pro se, to withdraw her guilty plea and requested that an attorney be appointed to represent her because she was indigent. The trial court held a hearing on Kennedy's motion to withdraw, but he did not appoint an attorney to represent her or inform her of her right to counsel. Following the hearing, the trial court denied the motion to withdraw the guilty plea, and this appeal followed. Kennedy contends, and the State agrees, that this case is controlled by Fortson v. State, 272 Ga. 457, 532 S.E.2d 102 (2000), and that the trial court committed reversible error **291 by failing to inform Kennedy of her right to representation at the hearing on her motion to withdraw her guilty plea, by failing to address her previous request for appointment of counsel, and by failing to ascertain whether she waived her right to counsel. In Fortson our Supreme Court held that a proceeding to withdraw a guilty plea is a critical stage of a criminal prosecution, and "the right to counsel attaches when a defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea, thus entitling that defendant to assistance of counsel." Id. at 460(1), 532 S.E.2d 102. Thus, the Court reasoned, the trial court must inform the defendant of the right to counsel and ascertain whether that right has been waived. Id. See also Murray v. State, 265 Ga.App. 119, 592 S.E.2d 898 (2004). The Court in Fortson also rejected application of the harmless error analysis, being instead persuaded by those majority *315 of cases holding that reversal and remand is the appropriate remedy for violations of this constitutional right. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case to the trial court for a re-hearing on [Kennedy's] motion to withdraw [her] guilty plea [said hearing] to be conducted in conformity with [the] opinion [in Fortson]. Fortson, 272 Ga. at 461(2), 532 S.E.2d 102. Judgment reversed

Page 1 

Georgia DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.