 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Jones4/6/2004
sregarded or ignored any of the evidence in mitigation offered by Defendant. Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by sentencing Defendant within the presumptive range.
Defendant failed to set out his remaining assignment of error in his brief. Because he has neither cited any authority nor stated any reason or argument in support of that assignment of error, it is deemed abandoned. N.C.R. App. P. 28(b)(6).
No error.
Judges HUNTER and McCULLOUGH concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).
|