 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond v. State8/18/2004
distinguishable. Unlike Raymond, the defendant in Marker could not show that his detention in one case was "in connection with" the offense for which his sentence was imposed. Marker sought sentence credit for excess time he had served in an earlier case, but the only connections Marker could show between his 1982 offense and his 1987 conviction was "that the 1987 offense may have been committed while Marker was on parole on the 1982 offense and that the state originally used the 1982 conviction as a prior felony offense to enhance Marker's sentence on the 1987 offense." These connections were too attenuated to warrant sentence credit under AS 12.55.025(c). The connection between Raymond's offenses is more substantial.
Conclusion
The district court is directed to give Raymond credit for time served for the entire 20 days of his DUI sentence. Raymond will then have approximately 11 days of credit remaining against the totality of his three sentences (assault, violation of release conditions, and DUI).
Page 1 2 3 Alaska DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|