DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. Godfrey

7/28/2004

eous objection.


Finley , 276 Mont. at 138, 915 P.2d at 215.


We conclude that the particular facts of this case do not compel the application of the plain error doctrine because there simply was no clear comment on or infringement of Godfrey's fundamental right to remain silent. Accordingly, and because there was no contemporaneous objection by Godfrey's counsel to the prosecutor's questions or comments, we affirm Godfrey's conviction.


We Concur:


JAMES C. NELSON


W. WILLIAM LEAPHART


JIM REGNIER


Justice Jim Rice specially concurring.


I concur in the decision of the Court to affirm, but under a different rationale.


There was no Doyle error here for two reasons. First, as the Court concludes, "there simply was no clear comment on or infringement of Godfrey's fundamental right to remain silent." See 40. Without an improper comment on Godfrey's silence, it is unnecessary to determine whether the State induced the silence under Doyle and Finley .


Secondly, the prosecution's comments were, in any event, appropriately made in response to Godfrey's assertion, as part of his innocence defense, that he had cooperated with police from the beginning, a theme offered during defense counsel's cross-examination of Officer Potter, during Godfrey's direct testimony and during defense counsel's closing argument. We said in Finley , "[the defendant] voluntarily chose to take the stand, and as such, his credibility was subject to impeachment just like any other witness." Finley , 276 Mont. at 141, 915 P.2d at 218. Here, Godfrey took the stand and the credibility of his assertion that he cooperated with police was properly subject to challenge, including his failure to share his trial story with police during the course of his "cooperation" with them.


JIM RICE


Chief Justice Karla M. Gray and District Judge Ed McLean, sitting in place of Justice John Warner, join in the concurring opinion of Justice Rice.


KARLA M. GRAY


ED McLEAN


Honorable Ed McLean, District Judge




Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

Montana DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.