 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin v. State10/19/2004
appears to contest Officer Rollison's testimony that she observed him driving his truck on the morning of April 15, 2003. Franklin's own testimony, however, undermines his claim that Officer Rollison testified falsely, as Franklin admitted on the stand that he drove to the Probation and Parole Office the morning of April 15, parked his truck and walked into the building. In the absence of any record support for Franklin's claim that the probation and police officers testified falsely, we conclude that Franklin's second and third claims are without merit.
(15) This Court has reviewed the record carefully and has concluded that Franklin's appeal is wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue. We are satisfied that Franklin's counsel made a conscientious effort to examine the record and has properly determined that Franklin could not raise a meritorious claim in this appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State's motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. The motion to withdraw is moot.
Page 1 2 3 Delaware DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|