 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. James12/20/2004
nce that he was not a long-term user of crack cocaine. Based on the foregoing, we find the entirely circumstantial evidence in this case was not substantial and merely raised a suspicion that James intended to distribute crack cocaine. Therefore, we hold the trial judge erred in failing to direct a verdict on the possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine charge as well as the related proximity charge.
Accordingly, James's convictions and sentences are
REVERSED.
STILWELL and SHORT, JJ., concur.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 South Carolina DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|