 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Pigman2/5/2002
Wis. Stat. § 343.305(3)(c).
. Consequently, any challenge to the blood test taken independently of the implied consent law would have to be made under the Fourth Amendment as an unreasonable search or seizure. However, Pigman does not challenge the lawfulness of the blood draw. Thus, we agree with the trial court's denial of Pigman's motion to suppress the blood test results. Consequently, the conviction is affirmed.
By the Court. -- Judgment affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4.
Page 1 2 3 Wisconsin DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|