DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. Crump

6/28/2002



. Defendant, Geoffrey L. Crump, appeals from his conviction and sentence for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, R.C. 4511.19, which were entered on Crump's plea of no contest after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence.


FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR


. "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN OVERRULING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE BECAUSE THE INITIAL STOP WAS WITHOUT REASONABLE CAUSE BECAUSE THE KETTERING POLICE OFFICER WHO MADE THE INITIAL STOP OF APPELLANT WAS OUTSIDE OF HIS JURISDICTION AND WAS OUTSIDE HIS AUTHORITY."


SECOND ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR


. "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN OVERRULING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE BECAUSE APPELLANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AGAINST UNLAWFUL SEIZURE OF HIS PERSON WERE VIOLATED WHEN HE WAS STOPPED BY A KETTERING POLICE OFFICER OUTSIDE OF SAID OFFICER'S JURISDICTION."


. Defendant Crump was arrested on November 10, 2000, by Kettering Police Officer David Marcum, in Washington Township. Marcum, who was on his way to work, stopped Crump's vehicle after he observed erratic driving. Defendant argues that because Marcum was outside his territorial jurisdiction when he stopped and detained Defendant for offenses committed and observed outside the officer's jurisdiction, the seizure of Defendant violated R.C. 2935.03 and was unreasonable for Fourth Amendment purposes.


. The evidence presented at the suppression hearing demonstrates that on November 10, 2000, at around 10:30 p.m., Kettering Police Officer Marcum was driving to work in his private vehicle. Officer Marcum was wearing a police bicycle uniform that had markings clearly identifying him as a police officer. He also wore his service revolver.


. While northbound on Yankee Street at Interstate 675, in Washington Township, Officer Marcum first noticed Defendant's vehicle stopped at the traffic light. As Defendant proceeded ahead of Officer Marcum on Yankee Street, Officer Marcum observed Defendant's vehicle weaving, crossing the center line at least twenty times. Defendant's speed was also fluctuating up and down between 35-45 miles per hour. Defendant stopped for the stop sign at Yankee and Mad River Road, and then accelerated rapidly as he turned northbound onto Mad River Road. When Defendant attempted to turn left onto Munger Road, Defendant's vehicle ran off the road and struck a tree. Defendant exited his vehicle and began walking away, westbound on Munger. Defendant's operation of his vehicle, as observed by Officer Marcum, occurred in Washington Township, well beyond the city limits of Kettering.


. Officer Marcum pulled up alongside of Defendant to check on him, whereupon Defendant attempted to enter Marcum's vehicle. Officer Marcum identified himself as a Kettering police officer and told Defendant to back away from his vehicle. In talking to Defendant about what happened, Officer Marcum observed that his speech was slurred, his eyes were glassy, and he had difficulty with agility while walking. These signs, coupled with Defendant's erratic driving led Officer Marcum to suspect that Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol.


. Officer Marcum told Defendant to sit down off the side of the road for his safety. Officer Marcum asked for and was given Defendant's drivers' license, Officer Marcum then used his police radio to request that a Montgomery County Sheriff's deputy be sent to the scene. Officer Marcum later testified that had Defendant attempted to leave, he would have stopped him. Officer Marcum did not arrest Defendant, however. Once the deputy sheriff arrived, Officer Marcum gave him Defendant's driver's license and related what

Page 1 2 

Ohio DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.