 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
In re L.G.5/27/2005
ued deprivation.
In the Interest of C. A. W., No. A05A0599, 2005 WL 517969, at *3 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 3, 2005).
(e) Termination Must Be in the Best Interests of the Children
The same testimony and documentary evidence that was presented at the TPR hearing and discussed above adequately supported the juvenile court's conclusion that the termination of appellant's parental rights would be in the best interests of L.G. and Y.G. In the Interest of K. N., No. A04A1820, 2005 WL 526803, at * 8 (b) (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2005); In the Interest of S.T., 244 Ga. App. at 89 (2).
3. Appellant's final claim of error is that the juvenile court improperly awarded permanent custody of L.G. and Y.G. to DFCS without adequately considering placement with a relative. We review the juvenile court's decision that there were no appropriate relatives with whom to place L.G. and Y.G. for an abuse of discretion. In the Interest of A. L. S. S., 264 Ga. App. at 324 (2). In light of the case manager's detailed testimony at the TPR hearing concerning the efforts made by DFCS to investigate multiple relatives for potential placement, and the failure by appellant or the putative father to timely provide the names and addresses of any additional relatives for consideration, we cannot say that the juvenile court abused its discretion. See In the Interest of A. L. S. S., 264 Ga. App. at 324-26 (2).
Judgment affirmed. Blackburn, P. J., and Miller, J., concur.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Georgia DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|