 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Huff5/20/2005
a)(3) (Ensley 1992). Arehart is not at all comparable. The district court in the present case made it clear that its determination was based on all the testimony, including that of Deputy Hamilton recited earlier, all of which pointed to Huff's guilt.
There was substantial competent evidence to support Huff's conviction.
Affirmed.
|