DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. Zakovi

4/12/2005

nce in support of the District Court's conclusion. We conclude that the District Court committed no error by denying Zakovi's suppression motion on these grounds.


Did the District Court err when it denied Zakovi's motion to suppress the results of his blood alcohol test on the grounds that the sample was collected in violation of § 61-8-405(1), MCA?


Zakovi argues that Binfet withdrew the blood sample at the direction of Officer Cohenour, and not pursuant to the supervision or direction of a physician or registered nurse in accordance with § 61-8-405(1), MCA. Zakovi argues therefore that the test results should have been suppressed. We disagree.


For the results of a defendant's blood test to be admissible as evidence under § 61-8-404(1)(b)(ii), MCA (2001), the blood sample shall be withdrawn by a person competent to do so under § 61-8-405(1), MCA, which provides:


Only a physician or registered nurse, or other qualified person acting under the supervision and direction of a physician or registered nurse, may . . . withdraw blood for the purpose of determining any measured amount or detected presence of alcohol . . . . " [Emphasis added.]


Binfet testified that, although she was advised by a secretary of the need for her assistance in withdrawing a sample of Zakovi's blood, she was nonetheless continuously under the supervision of a registered nurse on duty in the emergency room, as her position is subordinate and requires compliance with the registered nurse's orders under hospital policy. Thus, substantial evidence supported the District Court's conclusion that Binfet withdrew the sample in accordance with § 61-8-405(1), MCA, and therefore we conclude there was no error in denying Zakovi's motion to suppress the evidence on that basis.


Affirmed.


JIM RICE


We Concur:


KARLA M. GRAY


JAMES C. NELSON


PATRICIA O. COTTER


JOHN WARNER






Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Montana DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.