 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Todd5/4/2005
. 478, 19, 82 P.3d 1, 19; State v. Micklon, 2003 MT 45, 8, 314 Mont. 291, 8, 65 P.3d 559, 8. As stated above, Todd did not object to Peterson's testimony regarding the field sobriety tests at the time the testimony was offered at trial. Additionally, Todd did not mention the NHTSA handbook at trial, let alone assert that Peterson's failure to administer the tests as prescribed by the handbook made any testimony regarding the field sobriety tests inadmissible. Finally, Todd does not argue that this Court should address this issue pursuant to our statutory or common law powers of plain error review. We conclude, therefore, that Todd has waived his right to raise this issue on appeal and we decline to address it further.
Affirmed.
KARLA M. GRAY
We concur:
W. WILLIAM LEAPHART
BRIAN MORRIS
JOHN WARNER
JIM RICE
|